I keep encountering this quote and keep liking it, so here it is:
"The world in which you were born is just one model of reality.
Other cultures are not failed attempts at being you; they are unique manifestations of the human spirit." --Wade Davis
I'm not sure I have much more to add, beyond some related queries to chew on:
- In what ways do I assume that my model of reality is everyone else's model of reality?
- When do I hold other people and other cultures to a standard of success that is defined by becoming or being me?
- What threatens me about people and cultures that have different goals and hopes than I do?
- How can my sense of spirit and life be nurtured by appreciating other (sometimes radically different) manifestations of spirit and life?

Did you enjoy this? Subscribe to new posts, or follow me on Mastodon @ChrisHardie.
I think it's worth asking questions from the other side, particularly when you are in an intellectual environment where there is a push towards this general sentiment.
I might ask: Across the wide divide of our individual experiences, how can I try to understand other people's models of reality?
Or: If my acceptance of another person's model of reality is not matched in kind, how do I respond constructively to that?
Or: How can I find a compromise between accepting the reality of other people's models of reality, and disagreeing with the actionable conclusions that may arise from those differences? (Like: I get it that some people think homosexuality is a sin, but that doesn't mean I'm okay with it)
Or: Does the degree to which I accept other people's models as valid represent an underlying bias? (For instance a sentiment that it's fine that some isolated culture thinks witchcraft is real, but it's not so okay when a more wordly culture feels women should be in a subjugated role)
Or, relating another principle: I believe in individual freedom, but I don't believe in an individual freedom to sell oneself into slavery. And you can refine that down until there are things where I just *barely* think they are or aren't okay. I don't think there's any general rule either, any universal principal that could divide freedom from abuse. I think there is also an intellectual analog to that.